Regain Credibility and Relevance of Pharma Marketing in India
https://www.bodysatva.com/bodysatva.com/in/c/Books/21
abstract from ‘HOP in the Mind’ by Prabhakar Shetty
During the early 1970s and early 1980s the concept
of USP (Unique Selling Proposition) worked very well for the pharmaceutical salespersons.
Communications were designed to project a USP which had a significant ‘usage pull’ as described by Rosser
Reeves. The major pharmaceutical companies were the pioneers or innovators and
a significant number of their ‘brand names’ were mentioned in the text books.
The therapeutic index of Sarabhai Chemicals or Parke-Davis were much
sought-after by the medical profession as handy quick-reference books. The
salespersons of such companies were welcomed by Doctors and the interactions
were generally cordial or even jovial. The quality and performance of their
products was consistent and reliable. Many of the companies providing authentic
information had a very high credibility.
Credibility Gap
Coinciding with the opening of the pharmaceutical
industry for new players, in the 1980’s came the introduction of the price
control regime. A steady stream of ‘me too’ branded generics and combination
drugs were introduced in the market. When the USPs got blurred, the companies began to depend
on their creativity and credibility for improving ‘brand image’. Somewhere along the path of
creativity, the focus and seriousness of the communication was lost. When
applying the ‘brand image’ concept to pharmaceutical communications, the
serious and serial blunders started.
Whatever applies to the marketing of consumer goods
and commodities cannot be blindly applied to pharmaceutical marketing. The
increasing competition resulted in more frequent and frenzied communication.
Creativity blossomed, and Doctors were flooded with attractive posters,
calendars, prescription pads, exotic gifts and table top reminders. The
materials received by the Doctor on a single day would occupy his whole table.
Even though the prescriptions continued to be on the merits of the product,
this practice continues till date, because everybody believes that the Doctor
needs reminders. Only if the Doctor is convinced, and has included the product
in his 'hierarchy of priorities' - HOP, reminders help to reinforce and
strengthen the position in the HOP.
The visuals shown for drawing attention and
arousing interest must have a ‘usage pull’. The visuals used must convey the brand promise,
a superior
benefit, address
an unmet
need or
hint at an emotionally satisfying outcome for the patient. Most of the interest
arousers were frivolous or completely irrelevant. Almost all companies
adopted the Visual Aid Folder (VAF) as a communication aid. Soon the VAF became
a bulky folder with the selling stories of dozens of products of a company.
Each product’s story began with an ‘interest arouser’ page trying to build an
image, association with relief or visualize a problem that needed to be solved.
The interest arouser would show a great promise and the moment the salesperson moves
to the next page, it turns out to be the 50th branded generic of an existing
molecule. The Doctor who sees about 15-20 salespersons in day will be easily
fatigued and irritated by the barrage of frivolous and misdirected ‘interest
arousers’. Claims of efficacy or superiority were exaggerated without
scientific backing and thereby causing a credibility gap. Very often the claims are wrong, misleading or presented out of
context. We
can’t afford to get too creative with scientific facts.
The AIDA model of influencing a customer’s buying
behavior is generally quite useful in pharmaceuticals too. In the markets where
products have patent protection, the AIDA model is quite successful. In the
Indian scenario, it may not take the customer beyond the ‘awareness’ stage
because there are dozens of brands of the same molecule. More creativity leads
to a momentary hope of something unique, but results in further loss of
credibility.
This credibility gap has been steadily increasing
over the years and today (2018) Doctors seek verification of claims from
various sources. They verify from multiple sources on the internet and consult
colleagues and peers. The scepticism extends to newer emerging concepts also,
when it is conveyed by the MR. The concepts of Endothelial Dysfunction and
Metabolic Syndrome were initially greeted with scepticism or denial. Universal
acceptance of the newer concepts is now taking 2-3 years, because many Doctors
do not trust the results of clinical trials unless it is published by very
reputed journals.
It is heartening to note that amidst this chaotic
scenario, many domestic companies have maintained and improved their image and
credibility. The companies with high credibility back up every claim and sentence with references
from reputed medical journals and text books. The claims are presented in
the right
context with
appropriate precautions and warnings and about possible adverse effects and their
frequency.
The time has now come for a ‘code of ethical marketing practices’ to be applied by the
industry before it is enforced by the Authorities. Collective self-regulation by the pharma industry will
go a long way in restoring
the credibility of the
pharma industry and salespersons. It is never too late to adopt ethical
practices of promoting products and regain the credibility of information presented by
pharmaceutical companies.
Relevance
“Research shows that being useful and relevant is the only way to get
customers to tune-in” (Kate Sirkin)
The marketing and sales communication should take
cognizance of what is already
knownto the
Doctor and avoid repeating well known facts mechanically or in isolation.
Complete knowledge of the Doctor’s prescribing habits, likes and dislikes must
be ascertained through accurate market intelligence. Individualized
communication that addresses the specific needs of the Doctor will be relevant.
Remember that the Doctor is an expert in his field and that our messages are being conveyed by
amateurs, as
compared to the Doctors. Certain catch phrases like ‘most effective’, ‘most
economical’, ‘first time in India’, ‘freely available’ and ‘no side-effects’
were frequently used by MRs of various companies. These phrases had become
meaningless and irrelevant even in the late 1970s but is used with alarming
frequency even in 2018. Attracting and holding the attention of the Doctor was
difficult even during that period. The personal friendship or relationship of
the MR with the Doctor played a very important part in generating steady
business.
The marketing communications were largely ‘skippable’ or of ‘low relevance’ to Doctors even during that
period, except
when new information was provided. Doctors were eager to lay their hands on emerging
scientific information, which was occasionally provided by some pharmaceutical
companies. Along with the initial pleasantries; the most frequently heard
question was, “What’s
new”? The
most frequently heard mumbled response is “I know”. It is a signal that the window
of attention is yet to open. The first step would be to transform it into ‘I now listen’ by opening the ‘window of
attention’ for more than 5 seconds and engaging the Doctor in a dialogue. The
communication loop is completed only when the customer responds. During a
dialogue the conscious as well as the subconscious mind of the customer gets
involved and the evaluation process begins. This is the beginning of the
journey into and within the HOP.
Surveys conducted during that era also, indicated
that Doctor’s preferred crisp, clear, precise and useful information
presented in a logical sequence without repetition. They expected the MR to be
pleasant, soft spoken, service-oriented, honest and sincere too.
As a Group Product Manager of Parke Davis in 1993,
I was among the first to gift ‘annual subscriptions’ of International Medical
Journals to over a 1000 Physicians and Cardiologists. The child-like delight on
the faces of Cardiologists was a treat to watch. That was ‘new, useful and relevant’ at that point of time! The
novelty wore off in a few years when Doctors could directly subscribe
international journals.
Corporate involvement became essential to be
relevant to the Medical Profession. Conducting seminars, group meetings, round
table meetings, participating in professional associations’ meetings and
sponsoring medical education initiatives became an integral part of the
promotional mix.
The era of ‘Positioning’ (Al Ries and Jack Trout) was a boon to pharmaceuticals,
because the claims became specific to niche indications and the tendency of broad
generalized claims diminished significantly. Positioning was better suited for
pharmaceutical marketing and sales, even though the concept of USP continues to
reign supreme. To some extent relevance was being restored. Like the USP, the Positioning
can also be easily copied by other branded generics, but a subtle change had
begun. The medical profession started supporting the first product in the market or the
innovators as compared to the later entrants. Al Ries and Jack Trout were being
proved right in most of the therapy segments. On a macro scale the first
entrant or the innovators became brand leaders. On a micro scale where the
salesperson operates, the situation is different. The brand leaders may not be
represented at all in the area, or the Doctor may have his unique
priorities. The salesperson must deal with the individual HOP of each
Doctor.
By the late 1990s, Doctors were well informed about
prospective new chemical entities (NCEs) that were likely to be marketed in
India. Hence when NCEs were launched, the Doctor had prior knowledge about the
molecules and the only thing new was the brand name decided by the company. The
launch of an NCE would trigger at least a dozen companies to follow suit, each
with their own brand name. Soon a sense of scepticism would set in and the
‘new’ would turn into ‘well known news’ and no meaningful differentiation was possible.
Advocacy of a molecule or a therapy protocol, at
seminars became one the main reasons for a product or product category to enter
the ‘hierarchy of priorities’- HOP in the mind of the Doctor. Many
pharmaceutical companies seek endorsements from key opinion leaders or KOLs as
they are popularly called. The frequent seminars and continuing medical
education programs, conducted by various professional associations of medical
specialists, provides a platform for Doctors to share clinical experiences and
consult peers. These interactions have a very great credibility factor and strongly influence the
prescribing patterns.
Many companies stayed relevant by virtue of their close
relationship with KOLs and educational initiatives. Many companies engage the patients and Doctors
‘patient education’ initiatives and ‘detection camps’ which help people to
prevent or detect diseases early and begin timely treatment. The leading
companies have been ‘very
resourceful in being relevant’ to the Medical Profession and have entrenched
themselves in the minds of a majority of the Doctors. The resourceful
companies ‘engage’ the Doctor by sponsoring
educational courses which are relevant to the Doctor and develop emotional bonding with him.
The advent of the internet increased the
dissemination of scientific information further. Despite an initial (early
2000) reluctance to adopt new technology, Doctors are now generally internet
savvy. The need for information from the Indian pharmaceutical industry has
nosedived and is now limited to mundane things like price, dosage forms,
packaging, availability and additional services, if any.
As the pipeline of NCEs dwindled, the burgeoning
number of companies started launching exotic combinations and the selling
efforts became frenetic. The Doctors began restricting the time allotted to
salespersons. Pharmaceutical companies with a large list of branded generics,
launched multiple divisions. Doctors rarely found anything useful, relevant or
new in pharmaceutical communications. Numerous divisions of the same company
meet a Doctor, frequently with different brands of the same molecule or
formulation. Therefore, the attention span has steadily declined and is probably below 5 seconds in 2018. This is tune with
research on consumer behavior globally as explained in Marketing 4.0 by Philip
Kotler. It is called the “skippable world’s five-second challenge”.
To add to the mess, innumerable companies insist
that salespersons should meet many Doctors 2-4 times in a month. This kind of a
directive emanates from the erroneous belief that Doctors cannot remember the
brand. This is preposterous because Doctors have excellent memories. The ‘one shoe fits all’ approach of using the VAF
is outdated by decades according to the person who pioneered it for a specific
situation. Listening to obvious and often irrelevant information from 15-20
salespersons each day, makes the Doctor ignore practically all pharmaceutical
communications.
Misdirected communication based on wrong market
feedback results in further irrelevance. Frequently the products promoted to
the Doctor are distant even from the periphery of the Doctor’s ‘hierarchy of
priorities’- HOP.
The products introduced or promoted to the Doctor
must match the corporate image or expertise of the company. Cognitive
Dissonance comes into play when the ‘perceived image’ of a company does not
match with the products sold by them. The subconscious mind simply rejects the
input because it is not conforming to the deeply embedded image of the company.
GSK is known for innovative products, but it’s brand of Amoxycillin bombed in
the market. Innovators are expected to launch NCEs or innovative products. If a
company has an established range of products in a therapy segment, it is very
difficult to make a foray into other segments. Companies launch separate
specialty divisions for that purpose. Likewise, companies with a strong image
in other sectors like steel, tyres, petroleum, electronics or textiles made no
headway in their pharmaceutical business.
The entire pharmaceutical industry gets vague and non-quantified information about an individual
Doctor’s prescription (Rx) habits and patterns. A very significant number
of repeat
purchases and self-medication also happens. It is impossible for the
retailer to give accurate information. A better way of
gathering market intelligence is described in the book.
Despite the apparently irrelevant reminders for a long laundry list of
products, Doctors continue to grant interviews to salespersons, with the hope that someday he may come across a useful
product or concept worth adopting and including in his armoury.
If a Doctor does not prescribe a product, it is
because he is yet
to decide. We are
yet to give him a strong
reason to prescribe!
At this point it is worth noting that the
Doctor does
not have a cure for
most of the major chronic inflammatory diseases like Diabetes, Hypertension,
Arthritis, Asthma, Cancer, Cardiovascular and Neuro-degenerative diseases. All
that he can do is mitigate their suffering or delay the progression of the
disease till the inevitable end. The Doctor is searching for solutions to serious
intractable diseases and
today he is surfing
the internet quite
frequently and attending seminars and CME programs.
To regain credibility and relevance.
If our selling proposition resolves a problem or an
unmet need, we shall be useful and relevant. Sometimes it could be a service
to Patients, like the Caregivers Programs for Alzheimer’s disease patients or
Cancer patients. This will help us stay relevant to Doctors.
The communication package of the pharmaceutical
industry depends heavily on the robust marketing principles used for consumer
advertising. However, most of the principles need to be adapted for pharmaceutical
marketing. The
critical differences and adaptations needed for pharmaceutical marketing are
described in my book 'HOP in the Mind'.
The Marketing and Sales Team must undergo periodic training and
coaching to
individualize the communication to the specific needs of each Doctor. They must
regularly update their scientific knowledge to understand the needs and the
hierarchy of priorities of each Doctor.
Managers can become more relevant if they coach and
guide their subordinates to enter the HOP and convert Doctors. Managers are generally
promoted from the ranks for their seniority or relatively better sales
performances and that does not make them managers or leaders. A few companies
provide classroom training in managerial and leadership skills. Internalization of the skills is however, a long drawn
out process.
Today, Doctors and the salespersons perceive no use for the Manager, who makes the joint sales call.
Most of them are as ignorant as the salesperson and are unable to contribute
usefully during the sales call. They do not perceive any objective for the
sales call nor any sense of purpose because they are unaware of the Doctor’s
HOP and deliver a standardized monologue communication which is mostly
irrelevant. Doctors easily differentiate between the committed well informed
manager and the mere spectator. In the presence of the manager, most Doctors
tolerate a little bit more of the irrelevant communication, out of sympathy for
the salesperson. However, knowledgeable and service-oriented managers are
remembered well by the Doctors and it facilitates future interactions too.
The manager must be able to answer queries and have
ready access to relevant information. The manager must be able to involve in a
relevant dialogue, be fully aware of the specific use of his product and its
comparative aspects versus many molecules in the therapy segment. He should be
able resolve conflicts amicably and mature enough to respect and accept the
Doctor’s professional judgement. One of the objectives before, during and after
the call must be to set
an example worthy of emulation by any salesperson. The manager’s visit is
less frequent than that of the salesperson and therefore he has a very
important role in projecting a good image of the company.
Inspiring leadership can make a huge difference in
this scenario. An educated, motivated, useful, resourceful and happy
salesperson will be welcomed by Doctors and this may go a long way in making
us relevant
again.
‘Be aware, useful and resourceful to remain
relevant’
The whole gamut of pharmaceutical communications to
Doctors needs to undergo a major upheaval. Digital media should now be part of
the promotional mix, since it is now a routine for patients and Doctors to
verify many aspects online. Product specific or therapy segment wise websites
can help the Doctor and the patient to quickly access relevant information
and ensure
proper compliance to
medication.
The concept of Maxi-Marketing (by Stan Rapps and Tom
Collins) needs to be revisited by all those wish to get on to the digital
marketing bandwagon. The concept was maybe a little before its time. With
digital technology, it is now feasible to ‘elicit a response’ and also engage the
customer in a long-standing relationship. The promotional spend and efforts can
be focused on interested,
engaged, emotionally satisfied and high-yielding customers.
Leaders of pharmaceutical companies should now put
their heads together and arrive at some viable solutions. The era of promoting
a dozen products in a visit, is now over. Pharmaceutical salespersons need to
prepare well and focus on only one product in a visit and remind a couple of
other products which the Doctor may be prescribing. This will be far more
productive for the salesperson and less stressful for the Doctor.
Communications should be tailor-made for each individual Doctor with a clear understanding
of his ‘hierarchy of priorities’ - HOP. This will be perceived as professional
competence and will go a long way in regaining credibility and relevance for our communications.
Apparently this appears to be a tall order.
However, in practice it is very productive and yields consistent results faster
and with more certainty. Needless to emphasize that it prevents the enormous
wastage of time and effort, that is happening in the current circumstances. We
need to be aware of the Doctor’s needs and
address them with relevant communication supported by confirmatory evidence.
Let’s Reinvent pharmaceutical marketing and become useful and relevant again.
Status is online
Comments
Post a Comment